Hey, Adam asked me to pop this onto the blog so we could vote on his proposals. I’ll be pasting from the email he sent.
Superflex
Move to Superflex. Our QBs score points, but there are enough QBs for each team to score about the same points with their QB1. Superflex will make QBs 10-14 very interesting and put some strategy into the position.
Should we add a superflex position?
- Yes (70%, 7 Votes)
- No (30%, 3 Votes)
Total Voters: 10
Loading ...*** THIS RULE HAS PASSED ***
Tiered PPR Setting
Move to a tired PPR setting: 0.5ppr for RBs, 0.7ppr for WRs, 1.0 ppr for TEs. WRs are underpowered and after the top 2 players (Puka and JSN), there was a giant middle tier. Upping the ppr will help w/o washing out RBs. TEs are basically useless in our format outside of the top 3 guys. Going full ppr will make TEs 6-15 usable.
Should we approve the suggested tiered PPR system?
- Yes (90%, 9 Votes)
- No (10%, 1 Votes)
Total Voters: 10
Loading ...*** THIS RULE HAS PASSED. ***
HOWEVER – Adam meant to increase the difference between RBs and WRs. So, given that we’ve passed the tiered system, please vote below on which point system you prefer (default would be what you voted for above).
Which tiered-PPR System looks better to you?
- RB: 0.5 PPR / WR 0.7 PPR / TE 1.0 PPR (Current System) (60%, 3 Votes)
- RB 0.5 PPR / WR 1.0 PPR / TE 1.25 PPR (Franssen Special) (40%, 2 Votes)
Total Voters: 5
Loading ...© 2026, Josh Hammond. All rights reserved.
I will note that for Adam’s second proposal the only change would be TE’s moving from 0.7 ppr to 1.0 ppr. RB’s are currently 0.5 ppr and WRs are currently 0.7 ppr.
Well shoot. That means that the tiers should PROBABLY be 1PPR for WR and 1.25 PPR for TE.
How does the potential move to superflex change the starting lineup requirements? One less offensive flex? (which would make sense) Or an extra starter? (which I dont like)
I’m not quite sure how I feel. Superflex changes alot of the dynamics of a league, all the way down to the rookie draft. But I think, rather than a superflex, I would rather have an OP spot, where it *can* be a QB, but doesnt have to be. Maybe.
Yeah, I envision it as just converting one of the offensive FLEX positions to SUPERFLEX, where you can start a QB if you want but you don’t have to. It gives you SUPER FLEXIBILITY if you will.
Oh, I thought superflex meant it had to be a QB, my bad
i can’t believe we’re doing superflex.. i guess i’ll just have to envision it as some sort of wildcat formation thingy. Taysom Hills for all.
Yeah, SuperFlex is definitely more of a positive game mechanic vs. a replication of real-life football.
If we don’t like it we can always repeal it next year, prohibition style.